The Disclosure Project - 20th Anniversary Reflections

 

Listening to Steven Greer's recent 20th Anniversary Disclosure Project Webinar provided the opportunity to reflect on my perceptions of where UFO/UAP/Exo thinking has and hasn't changed over the last two decades.

Investigative journalist Paola Harris asked why many are still waiting for disclosure when it happened 20 years ago - and if you did your research even long before that.

For much of mainstream media and science it appears nothing much has changed in 20 years but for those who are open to listening there have been significant shifts in the acceptance and understanding of the UFO/UAP issue.

A number of speakers during the 5 hour webinar noted the following changes.

• Concerning shifts in 'official' UAP narratives from denial to "a possible threat to national security"

• A more nuanced view of 'official disclosure' that involves different factions with different agenda

• A shift in evidentiary focus from UAPs exist to "some are clearly off-world"

• A increasing shift from "Are there UFOs?" to "Craft are operated by a wide range of intelligent beings from different off-world cultures."

• A shift from "there's evidence indicating off-world craft" to "there's evidence of a mix of both man-made and off-world craft"

• A growing recognition that the study of UFO/UAP/Exo is linked to consciousness studies and a range of other anomalous phenomena  

• An increasing understanding that UFO/UAPs are controlled by intelligent sentient beings and that 'other-world' may be a better term than 'alien'  

Another significant shift noted was the recognition of the links between the UFO/UAP issue and challenges facing humanity and the planet.

The urgent need to access and use unacknowledged reverse engineered UAP technologies to address planetary issues was mentioned by several speakers.

Carol Rosen talked about the need to advocate for peace in space at a time when the public militarisation of space is progressing quickly. According to Rosen "both China and Russia have announced they would sign an agreement to ban all space-based weapons, with now over 100 countries also agreeing to ban all weapons from space."

Several speakers talked about the need to reach out to people in other countries and to question the "countries as enemies" narrative. We are one human family and perhaps with our expanding awareness "One Universe One People" as  Steven Greer says.

Timofey Egorov spoke about the benefits of people across the planet engaging in international social networking to discuss 'The Ethics of the Cosmos' to promote peaceful co-existence in outer space.

He spoke about the importance of uniting research into unknown phenomena of nature, cosmos and human abilities - an 'Ecology of the Unknown' - to contribute to the evolution of humanity.

Carol Rosen and several Russian speakers pointed to evidence that UAPs have stopped nuclear accidents and nuclear tests in space and that nuclear tests are very likely damaging space/time and possibly other dimensions.

Humanity is said to be viewed by some other-world civilisations as a risk to Earth and the cosmos in this and other dimensions. This is probably one of the reasons they have increased their observations of and contacts with Earth since 1945. Rosen suggested the need to shift from a military economy to a space economy.

Daniel Sheehan suggested that we shouldn't start the next stage of the human experience - which will likely involve meeting extraterrestrial civilisations - by taking weapons into space.

He called for people to question the agenda behind UAP narratives - whose interests do they serve?

This was echoed by Paola advising that when you see new disclosures ask yourself "What is the agenda here?"

A final shift I'll reflect on is a move toward personal empowerment and advocacy that is driven by the need to address current challenges facing humanity at local and global levels. This has taken the form of the development of

• various international disclosure initiatives 
• increasing respect and greater diversity among those discussing exo topics
• contact protocols and tools used by groups across the planet
• well researched publications and documentaries
• disciplined study and discourse such as exo studies and exopolitics

In summing up the 20th Anniversary Disclosure Project Greer and Sheehan asked:

"How much longer are we going to be killing the planet and engaging in endless wars before we come together as a human family? Before we join with other sentient beings in other-world civilisations?" - Steven Greer

"How can we as a community mobilise without being hostile or antagonistic to raise the consciousness of humanity?" - Daniel Sheehan

The Behaviour of Highly Evolved Beings in the Universe

Finding a dialogue on the behaviour of highly evolved beings in the universe in Conversations With God - Book 4: Awaken the Species was indeed unexpected.

The behaviours listed match much of what I've read in other sources but none of those sources collated and described them so clearly.

Walsch describes the source of the information in the Conversations With God series "as the highest source of wisdom within us - which I call God."

The dialogue in the 2017 Book 4 begins with a question about other sentient beings in the universe.

"Of course there are other sentient beings in the universe. They’re all over the place."

"That does not mean that they would in every case be helpful to you. Some of them are violent."

"Do not assume, then, that all other life forms in the universe have chosen to be of help as you seek to awaken humanity. Advanced civilizations do not automatically equate to highly evolved civilizations."

"Violent sentient beings from other galaxies will not be allowed to destroy your civilization. The Highly Evolved Beings existing in Another Dimension would make that impossible."

This last point was followed by the following exchange:

Question: And so we’re protected on Earth from the violence of an interstellar species?
Response: "You are safe from all but one."
Question: Omigosh, which one?
Response: "Earthlings. You are not yet safe from yourself."

And how will we know who are violent?

"You will know the difference between other life forms who are helpful and may not be helpful by feeling the vibration."

"If you’re paying attention to what you’re sensing, you’ll be able to make sense of it all."

"Your species has actually come to this at exactly the perfect time and in the perfect way."

The Behaviour of Highly Evolved Beings

"These are the common behaviours of Highly Evolved Beings, as compared to the behaviours of those humans who are living in an unawakened state.

1. An awakened species sees the Unity of All Life and lives into it. Humans in an unawakened state often deny it or ignore it.
2. An awakened species tells the truth, always. Humans in an unawakened state too often lie, to themselves as well as others.
3. An awakened species says one thing and will do what they say. Humans in an unawakened state often say one thing and do another.
4. An awakened species, having seen and acknowledged what is so, will always do what works. Humans in an unawakened state often do the opposite.
5. An awakened species does not embrace a principle in its civilization that correlates with the concepts that humans refer to as “justice” and “punishment.”
6. An awakened species does not embrace a principle in its civilization that correlates with the concept that humans refer to as “insufficiency”
7. An awakened species does not embrace a principle in its civilization that correlates with the concept that humans refer to as “ownership.”
8. An awakened species shares everything with everyone all the time. Humans in an unawakened state often do not, only sharing with others in limited circumstances.
9. An awakened species creates a balance between technology and cosmology; between machines and nature. Humans in an unawakened state often do not.
10. An awakened species would never under any circumstances terminate the current physical expression of another sentient being unless asked directly by that other being to do so. Humans in an unawakened state often kill other humans without that other human requesting them to.
11. An awakened species would never do anything that could potentially damage or harm the physical environment that supports the members of the species when they are physicalized. Humans in an unawakened state often do so.
12. An awakened species never poisons itself. Humans in an unawakened state often do so.
13. An awakened species never competes. Humans in an unawakened state are often in competition with each other.
14. An awakened species is clear that it needs nothing. Humans in an unawakened state often create a need-based experience.
15. An awakened species experiences and expresses unconditional love for everyone. Humans in an unawakened state often cannot imagine even a Deity who does this, much less do they do it themselves.
16. An awakened species has harnessed the power of metaphysics. Humans in an unawakened state often largely ignore it."

"There are more differences, of course, but those are some of the chief characteristics of an awakened species, and the major differences between such a species and humanity in its present unawakened state."

Much of Book 4: Awaken the Species is about how now is the "perfect time" for both highly evolved beings to assist humanity on Earth and for humans to help each other realise that they are already awake - they just don't know it and they don't behave like it.

"The whole universe, the entire cosmos in each of its dimensions, is filled with sentient beings, each imbued with the exact same desire – the desire to express and experience their True Nature and their True Identity."

"This involves a process of, first, moving through and knowing every aspect of being physical. Then moving through and knowing every aspect of being metaphysical. Then, integrating both."

"And here is the great secret that Highly Evolved Beings are focusing their energies on sharing: full integration can occur at any moment. The process can be condensed. An entire civilization can begin living as an awakened species whenever it wishes."

The source makes the point that humans have left things to the eleventh hour - but it doesn't take long to change one's mind. 

Also time isn't linear - a civilisation can change a great deal in a decade.

However it's not about trying to change others.

"It would indeed defeat your purpose if you set yourself apart as “Those Who Know”, and decide that it is your job to tell others what they don’t know. Your mission would be to tell others that they do know – and they simply may not know that they know."

Human Galactic History: Part 3 - Coherence and Contradiction

In a previous post I described a number of ways to explore human galactic history. However this is a complex topic and there are challenges when attempting to integrate different sources into coherent stories that fit within a consistent bigger picture. 

It's common to encounter apparent contradictions between sources resulting from misconceptions, or differences in language, perspectives or assumptions. These apparent contradictions can sometimes be resolved resulting in a richer and more nuanced galactic history.

The following illustrates some issues that may give rise to apparent contradictions in data or narratives.

1. Accurate dating is difficult

An Earth year is specific to Earth's revolution around the sun. Some channelled sources give time periods converted to 'Earth years' such as "30,000 Earth years ago". Other sources make no mention of the need to convert to 'Earth years'.

In Book 1 of The Law of One, considered by many to be one of the more accurate channelled sources, we find the following response to a question about when something was constructed. "This approximately was 60,000 of your years in the past time/space of your continuum." 

Channelled sources often admit that dates are approximate. In The Law of One for example several dates in Earth history are given and then corrected later in the text by as much as 30%.

Past life experiences retrieved through hypnotic regression may link to Earth eras/events such as "when Atlantis existed" or "when Atlantis sank". Authors then make their own assumption of the dates which can be a complex task given that various Atlantean civilisations probably existed over many tens of thousands of years and likely experienced at least 3 cataclysmic destructions. According to Edgar Cayce these destructions occurred approximately 50,000, 30,000 and 12,000 years ago and each involved portions of Atlantis sinking. 

Sometimes it's possible to correlate dates or events obtained through consciousness studies (channelling,  hypnosis, remote viewing) to generally accepted geologic dates such as magnetic pole shifts, volcanic activity or ice ages. This is also becoming possible for other planets such as Mars as knowledge in astrogeology increases.  

2. Differences in terminology

This issue is common in information received through channelling or hypnotic regression. A good example is the use of the terms 'universe' and 'galaxy'. 

Some sources or receivers or editors use universe and galaxy as synonyms even in the same paragraph. This seems to be more prevalent in sources from the 20th century when perhaps many receivers didn't have a clear understanding of the difference. 

In Books 1 and 3 of The Law of One this issue is specifically addressed when it becomes clear that the term 'galaxy' was sometimes being used to represent the Milky Way Galaxy, sometimes our local group of stars and sometimes a complex planetary system.   

3. Multiple similar epochs 

History often repeats itself - and so it seems does galactic human history. Contradictory accounts of an advanced civilisation or a high-tech war in space may be about different though similar events.

For example, it's very likely that Lemuria and Atlantis on Earth each went through several cycles of civilisation, and that there were even earlier civilisations. And galactic wars such as the Great Lyran War or the Orion Wars have probably come and gone over millions of years. It's easy to align narratives with the wrong event. 

In addition, stories obtained through consciousness studies can be referring to different dimensions (frequencies) of existence where experiences can vary considerably. Some very early civilisations described on Earth, Mars and other planets and moons in our solar system are often said to have been existing within dimensions 4, 5 and higher. 

Accounts of the destruction of a planetary environment (eg Mars) or even the planet itself (eg Maldek - now the asteroid belt) in the 3rd dimension may be experienced very differently within the 4th and 5th dimensions of the same planet. (Planets and humans are often described as being multidimensional.)

4. Time is neither linear nor sequential

Near death, UFO and extraterrestial experiencer accounts have described missing time, travelling in time and multiple timelines. Many spiritual texts and channels describe how the perception of time changes depending on levels of consciousness or dimensions.

For example Sal Rachele in The Mystery of Time explains how "a being in the 12th dimension might experience a million Earth years in the blink of an eye". Apparently high dimensional beings "have the ability to expand or contract time consciously".

The following table adapted from Rachele gives an illustrative example across the first 7 dimensions as follows. These time equivalents are not meant to be taken literally - "one month in the 5th dimension probably does not exactly equal one year in the 4th". 

For these reasons it may not be possible to accurately arrange human galactic history in simplistic sequences of linear Earth 3rd dimensional time. 

5. Over generalising one perspective of one experience

When using experiencer narratives it's important to obtain information about an event or place from as many sources as possible. One person's or even one group's perspective of an experience in galactic human history may be quite different from another's. 

This is usually well understand in the contest of Earth but sometimes authors can over generalise when hearing an account of life on Mars or in the Pleiades by one person or group with particular worldviews located in one place at one time - in one dimension.

Summary 

For some, contradictions between sources may indicate a lack of reliability and this may be true. 

However contradictions can also provide powerful insights into the complexity of a topic, pointing to ways in which they may be held within a more integrative framework.

Read Part 1

Nuclear War on Mars Goes Viral

A TikTok user recently responded to a request for "a conspiracy theory that blows your mind".

"My theory is that we've come from Mars after we drained all of its natural resources and destroyed it with nuclear bombs."

Their TikTok video response was posted in mid March 2021 and now has over 2 million views.

While some media outlets and science journalists were quick to debunk the 'war on Mars' idea these critiques appear to have come from a positivistic worldview with a questionable sense of certainty. 

My recent study of 'exo' topics and research using meta-integrative methods that explore post-positivistic science and inquiry make me much less confident in dismissing the possibility that a nuclear war on Mars may have destroyed its fragile planetary ecosystem in the distant past.

While I may disagree with some of the rationale given by the above TikTok user I'm still open to the general hypothesis and believe further exploration is warranted.

A more open meta-integrative approach to this topic that includes 'consciousness studies' could explore data from a variety of sources such as:

1. Physical evidence of nuclear explosions on Mars eg Death on Mars or Evidence of Massive Thermonuclear Explosions on Mars in the Past
2. Exo and astro evidence of a previous aquatic ecosystem on Mars eg Mars Ocean Hypothesis
3. Photographic evidence of a previous exo-civilisation on Mars eg The Face on Mars: Evidence of a Lost Civilization? or The Martians: Evidence of Life on the Red Planet
4. Remote viewing of Mars and Martian events eg Farsight Institute - Remote Viewing Cydonia, Mars
5. People with conscious memories of living on Mars eg We Are the Disclosure: A People's History of the Extraterrestrial Field or The New Human: Awakening to Our Cosmic Heritage
6. Memories of living on Mars recovered during hypnosis eg The Convoluted Universe - Book 2 and Book 3
7. Whistle-blower testimony of hidden information about Mars and its past eg Super Soldier Talk (includes Life on Mars)
8. Information about Mars and its past channelled during altered states of consciousness eg
   The Prism of Lyra: An Exploration of Human Galactic Heritage

From this kind of integrative research a coherent story of Mars begins to emerge that includes the possibility of a now extinct advanced civilisation. eg Galactic Histories: Mars

As a species with nuclear capability living on a planet with a compromised ecosystem it might be prudent to be open to possible lessons from the distant past.